Categories
Courses

integrated project – near field photogrammetry

Two well known commercial Photogrammetry Software Suites, Agisoft  Photoscan and Pix4D Pix4Dmapper have been compared to a Opensource product called Visual SFM with PMVS plugin. The Results showed about the same amount of point density for the two commercial products, with VSFM behind. The detail of rendering from Pix4D is inferior to Agisoft, espacially in the term of roughness of the produced point cloud. A ground sampling distance of 2,5 cm has been estimated with Pix4D which is competitive to Lidar workflows.

Objective

The main objective of the project was to compare the output quality of  different Software products based on the same input dataset. Quality was rated in terms of the local density of the point cloud, point distances compared to the other products and the roughness of the cloud, representing the modeling detail. Ease of use and the ability in Georeferencing was rated as well.

Method

The input dataset consisted of 34 aerial images of an alpine riverbed in Obermieming / Tirol made from an UAV [flight height ~ 95m above ground] and 6 corresponding ground control points measured with differential GPS. A dense pointcloud has been produced in each case, using the  integrated georeferncing tools as well. The datasets have been imported to the Software CloudCompare to evaluate the quality of the output by comparing each result with the other ones.

Results

Agisoft and Pix4D modeled about the same extent, with better results in  vegetated areas from Pix4D. VisualSFM did only model the unvegetated areas with unsatisfying results in the vegetated areas.

For further reading see attached Poster.

Categories
Courses

spatial data aquisition – orthophoto generation

The Goal of the project work was to get experience on using Handheld GPS devices, as well as working with the Software Trimble Pathfinder Office and Erdas Imagine LPS to generate an Orthophoto and a digital elevation model out of 6 aerial pictures and some additional data sources.

The aerial pictures are originally film-type, but have been provided already scanned to a digital format. As the pictures are already historic, there was also the challenge to find the pictured scenery in real life. Therefore it was essential to go well prepared into the field without the risk of doing false measurements as this could lead to a second try for the field work.

Data Processing:

The data was processed in the ERDAS Imagine 2013 toolbox “Leica Photogrammetry Suite” (LPS). For projection variables the horizontal projection was set to BMN M31 (EPSG:31258), the vertical projection was set to the Bessel spheroid with the MGI (Hermannskogel) date. As for the camera calibration information an average flying height of 3800m was chosen. This reflects the average flying height of the plane of 4700m above sea level in combination with the average elevation of the study area. Additional camera calibration information was retrieved from an calibration file in .cam- format.

After entering this first set of information about the coordinate reference system and the recording-parameters, the workflow as shown was used.

Result

The final result of the project is the mosaicked orthophoto, overlaid onto the generated DTM. The final output covers the area around the Gaisberg. In the northeast, it is just missing out the main parts of the villages of Schnurnn and Koppl. As for the southwest, it shows the buildings close to “Schloss Aigen”.